Irritant potential of one buccal spray of propolis and eucalyptus in oral mucous of hamster

Main Article Content

Dámarys Suárez Gómez
Mario Fajardo Cárdenas
Guillermo Aparicio López
Nelson de Jesús Merino García
Addis Bellma Menendez
Odalys Valdés Martínez
Jesús Domínguez Peña

Abstract

The buccal spray made from Propomax 5 and eucalyptus essential oil is a valid and effective for the welfare of the throat and oral cavity help. In addition to creating a protective layer that prevents the entry of viruses, bacteria and fungal growth, also it has anti-inflammatory effect on the mucous membranes of pharynx, larynx and throat. It stimulates the generation of dentine and prevents cavities and plaque. This formula is a solution that we will be used for application to oral mucous. One of the risks of this job is the potential irritant that could express the product by its contact with the oral mucous. For the characterization of their toxicological potential acute irritant effects after administration of the oral mucous hamster, five batches of a mouth spray solution were determined, showing an irritant response null; so we concluded that this substance classified as "Nonirritating".

Article Details

How to Cite
Irritant potential of one buccal spray of propolis and eucalyptus in oral mucous of hamster. (2015). Apiciencia, 17(2). https://apiciencia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/apiciencia/article/view/80
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Irritant potential of one buccal spray of propolis and eucalyptus in oral mucous of hamster. (2015). Apiciencia, 17(2). https://apiciencia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/apiciencia/article/view/80

References

Amoros, M., C. M. Simões, L. Girre, F. Sauvager, and M. Cormier. (1992). Synergistic effect of flavones and flavonols against herpes simplex virus type 1 in cell culture. Comparison with the antiviral activity of propolis. Journal of Natural Product. 55:17321740.

Bankova, V., R. Christov, A. Kujumgiev, M. C. Marcucci, and S. Popov. (1995). Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis. Z. Naturforsch. 50c:167-172.

Banskota, A. H., Y. Tezuka, J. K. Prasain, K. Matsushige, I. Saiki, and S. Kadota. (1998). Chemical constituents of Brazilian propolis and their cytotoxic activities. Journal of Natural Product. 61:896-900.

Bonhevì, J. S., F. V. Coll, and R. E. Jordà. (1994). The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics. Journal American Oil Chemestry. Soc. 71:529-532.

Burdock, G. A. (1998). Review of the biological properties and toxicity of propolis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 36:341-363.

Chan, P.K. and Hayes, A.W. (1994). Acute Toxicity and Eye Irritancy. In: Principles and Methods of Toxicology. Third Edition. A.W. Hayes, Editor. Raven Press Ltd., New York, USA, 54-58.

Duailibe SA, Gonçalves AG, Ahid FJ. (2007). Effect of a propolis extract on Streptococcus mutans counts in vivo. J. Appl Oral Sci. Oct; 15(5):420-3.

Eguizábal A., M. and Moromi Nakata, H. (2007). Actividad antibacteriana in vitro del extracto etanólico de propóleo peruano sobre Streptococcus mutans y Lactobacillus casei. Rev. Odontología Sanmarquina. 10(2).

FDA. 2012. Good laboratory practice (GLP) for non-clinical laboratory studies. 21 CFR Part. 58. Disponible en: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/98fr/98033 5s1.pdf. [Consultado Jun. 5, 2015].

Ghisalberti, E. L. (1979). Propolis: a review. Bee World. 60:59-84.

Ikeno, K., T. Ikeno, and C. Miyazawa. (1991). Effects of propolis on dental caries in rats. Caries Res. 25:347–351.

Instituto Cubano de Normalización, Metrología y Control de la Calidad (ICNMCC). 1975. Control de la Calidad. Selección de muestras aleatorias. Tabla. NC-92-09. La Habana: ICNMCC, 1-14.

Koo, H., A. M. Vacca Smith, W. H. Bowen, P. L. Rosalen, J. A. Cury, and Y. K. Park. (2000). Effects of Apis mellifera propolis on the activities of streptococcal glucosyltransferases in solution and adsorbed onto saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Caries Res. 34:361- 442.

Koo, H., B. P. F. A. Gomes, P. L. Rosalen, G. M. B. Ambrosano, Y. K. Park, and J. A. Cury. (2000). In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and Arnica montana against oral pathogens. Arch. Oral Biol. 45:141-148

Koo, H., P. L. Rosalen, J. A. Cury, G. M. B. Ambrosano, R. M. Murata, R. Yatsuda, M. Ikegaki, S. M. Alencar, and Y. K. Park. (2000). Effect of a new variety of Apis mellifera propolis on mutans streptococci. Curr. Microbiol. 41:192-196.

Koo, H., P. L. Rosalen, J. A. Cury, Y. K. Park, M. Ikegaki, and A. Sattler. (1999). Effect of Apis mellifera propolis from two Brazilian regions on caries development in desalivated rats. Caries Res. 33:393–400.

Koo, H.; Rosalen, P.; Cury, J.A.; Park, Y.K. and Bowen, W.H. (2002). Effects of Compounds Found in Propolis on Streptococcus mutans Growth and on Glucosyltransferase Activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. May; 46(5): 1302–1309.

Moreno, Z., Martínez, P.; Figueroa, J. (2007). Efecto antimicrobiano in vitro de propóleos argentinos, colombianos y cubano sobre Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175. Rev. NOVA - Publicación Científica - ISSN: 1794-2470. 5(7):1-100.

Park, Y. K., M. H. Koo, J. A. S. Abreu, M. Ikegaki, J. A. Cury, and P. L. Rosalen. (1998). Antimicrobial activity of propolis on oral microorganisms. Curr. Microbiol. 36:24-28.

Premoli, G.; Laguado, P.; Díaz, N.; Romero, C.; Villarreal, J.; González, A.J. (2010). Uso del Propóleo en odontología. Acta Odontol. Venez; 48(2).

Propiedades medicinales del eucalipto. Disponible en: http://www.botanicalonline.com/medicinalseucalipto.htm. [Consultado Jun. 5, 2015].

Tazawa, S., T. Warashina, T. Noro, and T. Miyase. (1998). Studies on the constituents of Brazilian propolis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 46:1477-1479.

UNE-EN ISO 10993-10, (2003). Evaluación Biológica de productos sanitarios. Parte 10: Ensayos de irritación e hipersensibilidad retardada. Norma española (ISO 1099310:2002): 35-39.