Importance of reforestation with wood-honey species
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the last decades, high habitat losses have been reported worldwide. Numerous researchers agree that this loss has contributed in the long term to the decrease in bee populations. apis mellifera bees are the most valuable pollinator of monocultures in the world. For this reason, this research aims to reflect the importance of reforestation with wood-melliferous and non-wood-melliferous species. In also, special emphasis is placed on the relevant role of pollinators and the countless benefits obtained from forests. Additionally, honey is highlighted as one of the main non-timber forest products (NWFP) and the flowering season variables are analyzed. As a suggestion of species for reforestation, species such as Palo de Campeche (Haematoxylum campechianum L.), Guamo (Inga codonantha), Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp), Pataban (Laguncuria racemosa), Mangrove Prieto (Avicennia germinans)
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
How to Cite
References
Ariza W, Huertas C, Hernández A, Gelvez J, González J, López L. 2013. Caracterización y usos tradicionales de productos forestales no maderables (PFNM) en el Corredor de Conservación Guantiva-La Rusia-Iguaque. Colombia Forestal. 140pp.
Betancourt, B. A. (1997). Silvicultura especial de árboles forestales tropicales. La Habana. Ed: Científico- Técnica.
Bradbear, N. 2009. Bees and their roles in forest livelihoods: A guide to the services provided by bees and the sustainable harvesting, processing and marketing of their products. Series non-wood forest products 19. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Fao). 194pp.
Entomología, Jardín Botánico Atlántico y Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad. España. Madrid. 160pp.
Espina, P. D, Ordetx, G. S. 1984. Apicultura tropical. (4ta ed.). Cartago: Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica. 20pp
Herrero, E, J. A. 2002: Tendencias y perspectivas del sector forestal hasta el año 2020. Rev. Forestal Baracoa Vol.1 (1): 3-14.
Hevia V, Gonzáles, J. A, Ortega, J. Importancia funcional de los polinizadores en cultivos de oleaginosas: informe de síntesis basado en una revisión sistemática. 18pp.
http://www.granma.cu/ciencia/2017-06-23/barrera-natural-de -proteccioncostera-23-06-2017-21-06-49
Luz CFP, Barth OM. Pollen analysis of honey and beebread derived from Brazilian mangroves. Rev Bras Bot. 2012; 35(1):79-85.
May. T, Rodríguez. S. 2012. Plantas de interés apícola en el paisaje: Observaciones de campo y la percepción de apicultores en República Dominicana. Revista Geográfica de América Central. República Dominicana. 162pp.
Pérez, P. A. 2007. Manual de apicultura. La Habana. Angrifor. 154 pp.
Porter-Bolland L. 2003 La apicultura y el paisaje maya. Estudio sobre la fenología de floración de las especies melíferas y su relación con el ciclo apícola en La Montaña, Campeche, México. Mex Stud.19 (2):33-33.
Raina. SK, Kioko. E, Zethner. O, Wren. S. 2011. Forest habitat conservation in Africa using commercially important insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 56:465-85.
Rodríguez, M. 2006. Oportunidades comerciales para productos apícolas. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. 85 pp.
Roig, J.T. 2014. Diccionario Botánico de nombres vulgares cubanos Tomo I. Editorial Científico-Técnica. La Habana 586 pp.
Roig, J.T. 2014. Diccionario Botánico de nombres vulgares cubanos Tomo II. Editorial Científico-Técnica. La Habana 1128pp.
Sande S, Crewe RM, Raina SK, Nicolson SW, Gordon I. Proximity to a forest leads to higher honey yield: Another reason to conserve. Biol Conserv. 2008; 142(11):2703-2709.
Skewes, JC. y col. 2018. La apicultura y la conservación socialmente inclusiva del bosque. RIVAR Vol. 5, No 14. Chile. 21 pp.
Valdés, R. Y, Rodríguez, J.L. 2017. Proyecto de reforestación participativa para el fortalecimiento de la producción de miel, en el Consejo Popular “Palma del Perro”, en el municipio Guisa, provincia Granma. 16pp.